For security purposes, and to ensure that the public service remains available to users, this government computer system employs programs to monitor network traffic to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or change information or to otherwise cause damage, including attempts to deny service to users. More Information Internet Security Policyīy using this site, you are agreeing to security monitoring and auditing. For more information, contact more information, please see the SEC’s Web Site Privacy and Security Policy. You can also sign up for email updates on the SEC open data program, including best practices that make it more efficient to download data, and SEC.gov enhancements that may impact scripted downloading processes. Please declare your traffic by updating your user agent to include company specific information.įor best practices on efficiently downloading information from SEC.gov, including the latest EDGAR filings, visit sec.gov/developer. Your request has been identified as part of a network of automated tools outside of the acceptable policy and will be managed until action is taken to declare your traffic. To allow for equitable access to all users, SEC reserves the right to limit requests originating from undeclared automated tools. The matter is also being examined by the Justice Department, the congressional Government Accountability Office and the Pentagon’s Inspector General.Your Request Originates from an Undeclared Automated Tool He said a settlement needed to be negotiated, but the estimated replacement value for all of the topside equipment in question was only about $3 million. Lockheed was eager to resolve that remaining issue, said spokesman Troy Scully. But in a subsequent letter, the service expressed concern about only one issue under Lockheed’s watch involving certain topside equipment items. Lockheed Martin said the Coast Guard initially identified nine class-wide issues, of which five were under its area of responsibility. “ICGS remains willing to further discuss these issues with the Coast Guard and explore an amicable resolution of all issues,” she said. ICGS spokeswoman Megan Mitchell said the company was reviewing the Coast Guard letter and would respond directly to the Coast Guard. She said the $96.1 million payment was not a final estimate, but could form the basis for a negotiated settlement with the venture. The program, which was due to produce more than 91 new cutters, 195 new aircraft plus new communications and surveillance equipment, has been dogged by cost overruns and delays. In April the Coast Guard announced it was decommissioning the boats because of structural problems and was taking back management responsibility for the overall $24 billion, 25-year modernization program known as Deepwater. The service was “unaware of the magnitude and cause of this design defect at the time of acceptance of the eight cutters,” she said. Lockheed and Northrop, which began work in 2002 to lengthen the eight 110-foot patrol boats to 123 feet, had challenged the legality of the Coast Guard’s decision to reject the boats this past summer, since the service initially accepted the boats.īut Williams said later investigations showed the converted cutters were unsound and unfit to operate under typical conditions expected of high speed craft that require structural resistance to hydrodynamic loads such as slamming.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |